Back to Archive Document

NBWTA Report 1903-044

Image details

Document format
Year
Transcript
Original Source Organisation
Original Source URL
Transcription 82
83
It, therefore, appears to be clear that in the past the magistrates
have not carried out the spirit of the policy embodied in the Acts
passed upon this question, that license to sell liquor should be given
where it was considered that the public convenience would be served,
and no evil or nuisance to the community result therefrom.
Probably the most scandalous instance of the neglect of magisterial
duty is presented by the Hard at Portsmouth, where, out of 25
structures in succession, 16 are licensed premises, and, out of 19 ina
row, 14 have licences, and, at one point, 8 out of 9 of the buildings
We
This part of the town is known as the Devil’s Acre.
are licensed.
here,
licences
granting
in
magistrates,
the
that
conceived
have
should
would have taken into consideration the necessity of guarding the young
sailors as they passed to and fro from the docks, instead of permitting
this net-work of evil to surround our blue-jackets on their return to the
WHO
MAGISTRATES
AWAKE.
At the last Licensing Sessions, however, the magistrates appear to
have had an arrest of thought, and a return to a sober sense of their
responsibility.
Whether it is the increased expenditure ; whether it be the un-
hesitating pronouncements made upon the question by judges and
medical men and employers of labour; whether it is that the voice of
that
the
truths
The result has been,
as I have
already
said,
that
it
is estimated
that the licences refused were as follows :—
es
a
nee
Not required...
Not required and other grounds...
m,
oe
Other grounds only ...
PusBLic-HoussEs ?
that
220
mas
201
.
seers
639
Licences refused on
Appeals pending in 311 of these cases.
ground of non-requirement only represent about one-sixth per cent. of
And the question immediately suggests itself, “ Is it true
the whole.
‘that as a rule people thus deprived of licences have lost their means
And as we deal with that fact we have to ask
“of a livelihood?”
ourselves, ‘ Who own the public-houses?”
THE
ee
reformers has at last been heard, and
they have enunciated have found an echo in other hearts ; or whether it
is that a combination of all these signs of the times point to the acute
stage which this evil has reached, I know not ; but I believe that the
agitation that has been going on for the last seventy years has borne
some fruit, and therefore at last the magistrates are awake to the danger,
and by almost unanimous consent have determined to do something to
diminish the incalculable harm wrought by the number of licensed
houses in all parts of the country.
Sere
Temperarce
THE
To this we must unhesitatingly reply, outside London, almost without
exception, “ The brewers.”
It is here that the great liquor rings have
their gigantic monopolies, and it is here that the provisions of the
Licensing
Act
relating
to
the endorsement
of licences
are
largely nullified.
This criticism was made very strongly by no
Temperance Society, but by
the committee
appointed
by the
Quarter Sessions of Chester to examine the state and effect of the law
relating to licensed houses.
The forfeiture of licences which often
should occur is evaded because as the brewer owns the house he im-
mediately offers to substitute the manager by another man, while the
manager naturally wishes to ingratiate himself with his employer by pro-
moting as far as possible a large consumption of liquor, and, as the
Chester Committee stated in 1891, practical experience at all events has
created a keen jealousy of the system of tied houses and a determina-
tion to make a stand against its unlimited preponderance.
Under the
present system, as Messrs. Rowntree and Sherwell have truly shown,
there exists a monopoly trade admittedly dangerous, which it is in the
interest of the State to restrict, the profits and conduct of which are put
into the hands of those who have every inducement to extend it.
Two
such powerful passions as the lust for money and the craving for spirits
are allowed so to combine that the force of each is increased to
unnatural proportions.
homeland.
THE
Own
ACTION
OF
THE
LossES
MAGISTRATES
TO
THE
IS FOLLOWED
CONSERVATIVE
BY
ELECTORAL
Party.
It is memorable that almost immediately following the action of the
magistrates two bye-elections took place, Rye and Woolwich, and
an unparalleled situation in the history of Temperance Reform was
thus created.
wesglt will be better for the licensed victuallers to speak for themselves
regarding this matter, for at the Woolwich bye-election the following
pamphlet was scattered broadcast among licence-holders of the Beer
and Wine Trade National Defence League, 7, Victoria Street, S.W. :—
**An opportunity now presents itself to you to give practical
expression to your indignation against the Government which has
raised our taxes, harrassed our interests, and shows no signs ot
willingness to protect our property against confiscation by the
Magistrates.
Licence-holders have too long acted like blind sheep
in support of Government candidates.
The time has arrived when
the Government should be made to feel the full force of our
resentment of their policy towards our trade; and if licence-
holders have any regard for their rights, they will, at ad? dye-elec-